You can’t make this stuff up…
Nearly 2 years after the disaster brought on through gain-of-function research in Wuhan—funded by the N.I.H.—Fauci continues to fight for funding for his Chinese counterparts.
What Fauci stands accused of is already bad enough, but he seems to be doubling down on his rhetoric and failed policies instead of taking a step back…
Several notable GOP members have already said that if the party seizes power in 2022 they will push for a full-fledged investigation into Fauci and the N.I.H.
Roger Marshall and Jim Jordan recently sat down to discuss Fauci’s continued cover-up and obfuscation of his role in creating a global pandemic:
Fauci wants funding for “new vaccine platforms, such as nanoparticle vaccines… mucosal or internasal vaccine.”
This sounds like the request to DARPA for a vaccine that can be sprayed onto a population, DARPA turned it down saying it was too dangerous.https://t.co/2RiUc5e3xJ
— Philosophy Wins (@philosophy_wins) June 22, 2022
Western Journal sounded the alarm:
During Senate testimony Thursday, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases revealed that he would not stop funding biomedical research in China when asked by GOP Sen. Roger Marshall.
Fauci Refuses To ‘Stop Funding Chinese' Research With US Tax Dollarshttps://t.co/SiKIHIx6Dk
— ClintTorrez (Psyop Perception Management) (@shartstorm8d8) June 22, 2022
Hold on a second. Biden said “we need more money to plan for the second pandemic.” Is Fauci funding another virus?
— William Drew (@TheConquerorW) June 22, 2022
Washington Examiner details this email between Dr. Jeremy Farrar, Francis Collins, and Fauci:
Dr. Jeremy Farrar, the director of the Wellcome Trust, sent an email to Collins, Fauci, and Lawrence Tabak, then the principal deputy director of the NIH and now its acting director, on Feb. 2, 2020, summarizing the conference call the night prior and indicating that some of the scientists believed the lab leak hypothesis was viable.
Farrar noted, for example, that Mike Farzan, dubbed the “discoverer of SARS receptor” and a professor of immunology at Scripps Research, found a key aspect of the virus “highly unlikely” to have developed outside a lab.
“So I think it becomes a question of how do you put all this together, whether you believe in this series of coincidences, what you know of the lab in Wuhan, how much could be in nature — accidental release or natural event? I am 70-30 or 60-40,” Farrar recounted Farzan saying on the call.
